Lampwork Etc.
 
TrueDesign

LE Live Chat

Enter Live Chat

No users in chat


Frantz Art Glass & Supply

Beads of Courage


 

Go Back   Lampwork Etc. > Library > Tips, Techniques, and Questions

Tips, Techniques, and Questions -- Technical questions or tips

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 2010-01-06, 3:38pm
theglasszone's Avatar
theglasszone theglasszone is offline
I speak Murrini!
 
Join Date: Oct 12, 2006
Location: In a Glass House, CA
Posts: 9,170
Default Fusing question: COE?

Hi there all you fusing-knowledgeable people! I've signed up for a fusing class and am really excited about it!

I believe I read somewhere that fusing with COE 104 was either a pain in the butt or problematic in some other way. I have lots of 104 (rod, mili, etc.), but am considering buying some COE 90 for fusing purposes; I'd just prefer not to HAVE to unless there's some HUGE PROBLEM with fusing 104. Either way, I'm gonna have to buy some sheet (either 104 or 90) but thought I'd throw this out there before purchasing.

Can any of you tell me the pros and cons of COE 90 versus COE 104 in fusing?

Thanks so much in advance!

De

(POSTING IN THE "FUSING" SECTION too!)
__________________
~DeAnne~
I've got a murrini for that,'ya know!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Only a fool rushes to his own demise..." ~Zorro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2010-01-06, 3:48pm
SadiesJewels's Avatar
SadiesJewels SadiesJewels is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 21, 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,629
Default

Hi De,

I'm a previous fuser and most people fuse with 90 followed by 96. 104 fusers are very few and far between basically because the range of sheet available is very very limited in 104 and what does exist is somewhat problematic (devit and incompatibility) - , whereas there is a lot of very nice 90 - all tested compatible etc etc. Some people use 96 because it's cheaper. It is becoming more widely available but the color range in Bulls eye with their emphasis on quality is what always sells it to me.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2010-01-06, 4:30pm
theglasszone's Avatar
theglasszone theglasszone is offline
I speak Murrini!
 
Join Date: Oct 12, 2006
Location: In a Glass House, CA
Posts: 9,170
Default

Oh, thank you so much for the reply; I think Bullseye/90 COE is the way I'll go! I'll have to buy some sheet and want to get some rods to make my own murrini and inclusion stuff, so off I go to unload some goodies (hopefully!) in Garage Sale!

Appreciate it!

De
__________________
~DeAnne~
I've got a murrini for that,'ya know!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Only a fool rushes to his own demise..." ~Zorro
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2010-01-06, 11:48pm
JetAge Studio's Avatar
JetAge Studio JetAge Studio is offline
Burning through glass
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2007
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,689
Default

De, dont' fuse with 104....the fusing standard has not been as finely tuned for this coefficient WHATSOEVER as has been with Bullseye 90 or Spectrum 96....go with either 90 or 96 and only of either singular manufacturer ( and in my experience...Gaffer, Reich...even Uroboros, or any of the other 96 do NOT always produce good compatibility with fusing sheet 96 if you decide to use that coe).

...so if you go with 90, you'll be ok ...lots of rod and sheet to play with and all totally compatible. (more expensive though and a little harder to cut hand rolled sheet glass verses machine rolled 96 but...meh!)

I have been fusing for 5 years...many questions have been answered faithfully in the kiln.
__________________
Renee Wiggins


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Changeable Jewelry, Murrini & MORE!

Custom Supplies:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

& Fine Art Beads & Jewelry:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by JetAge Studio; 2010-01-06 at 11:55pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2010-01-07, 12:06am
Puddy Tat Glass's Avatar
Puddy Tat Glass Puddy Tat Glass is offline
Critter Mom
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2007
Location: Coquille, Oregon
Posts: 2,496
Default

I use Bullseye rods and sheet and I got an email from Bullseye in September with info regarding compatibility issues. I thought I'd just post what Bullseye said so I get it right :

Bullseye Rod Is Now Graded for Kilnforming

Last year when we developed five new opaque rod styles that were not suitable for kilnwork, we began systematically testing all of our rods for fusibility. With testing now complete, we can confirm that all but 17 of our rod styles can be used reliably in kilnwork. (Every one of our rod styles can be used reliably in torchwork.)

Because more kilnworkers than ever are now fusing with rod, we've decided to grade our rod styles for kilnforming suitability. (The new grades are essentially irrelevant for torchworkers.)

The new grading system:

“F” rod is recommended for kilnwork or torchwork. The current “F” list includes all but 17 rod styles.

“T” rod is recommended for torchwork only. The current “T” list includes just 17 rod styles.

Frequently asked questions:

Has Bullseye rod changed?


No, our rod has not changed in any way. We’re simply grading it for fusibility, for the benefit of kilnformers who want to incorporate rod into their work.


Is all Bullseye rod still suitable for torchwork?



Yes. All of our rod styles combine safely and reliably in the flame, just as they always have. The new “F” and “T” grades have essentially no relevance for torchworkers.


Which rods are graded “F”? Which are graded “T”?



The new grades are easy to locate using the search tools in our online store. Very soon, you’ll also find the grades noted in TorchTips. All but 17 Bullseye rod styles are graded "F". The 17 non-fusible "T" styles include:


4 Opals: Dense White (000313-0065); Pink Opal (000301-0065); Salmon

6 Opaques: All but White Opaque (000013-0065), which is fusible.

4 (All) Lustres

3 (All) Streakies


How can I learn about kilnforming with rod?


We suggest you start by reading the new kilnworking notes for each “F” grade style in TorchTips
. You might also consider taking our October 16-19 class, Kilnforming with Rod, to explore possibilities for creating lenses, interior textures, patterns, and optical phenomena.

Pink Opal (000305-0065); Gold Purple (000334-0065)
__________________
Bonnie

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 2:33am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Your IP: 3.145.130.31